Author: rqkNKzuuUx67fBmPNyVcMrQX

  • Family Business Advisor Robin Matthews on the Modern Challenges Facing Family Businesses

    Family Business Advisor Robin Matthews on the Modern Challenges Facing Family Businesses

    by Sophia Bennett

    There are good things and bad things about being involved in a family business. Research shows that family enterprises have greater longevity, better business practices, generate plenty of wealth for owners, and are less likely to lay people off during tough times. Individuals who get along with their family members say there’s something special about seeing the people they love every day and building something meaningful with them.

    On the other hand, emotions can run high in a family business, especially during times of transition. Because many family businesses are structured differently than other corporations, they face challenges their non-family owned counterparts never encounter.

    Whether family businesses are seeing great success or dealing with divisive and potentially catastrophic issues, having a trusted advisor who can assist with financial and structural decisions can make a big difference.

    Robin Matthews, CPA, partner at Jones & Roth CPAs and Business Advisors, got involved with family businesses early in her career. Her area of specialty was estate planning, so she spent a lot of time working with businesses on their succession plans. As they grew to trust her, they often pulled her in to help with other business decisions. Now Matthews specializes in providing a range of services to Oregon family-owned enterprises.

    Reading Between the Lines

    It should come as no surprise that human resources matters are often challenging for family firms. “People often ask us how much they should pay their family members who are employees versus their family members who are owners,” Matthews says. “We often talk about multiple hats. You’re a board member but you’re also a shareholder, so which hat are you wearing today? If I’m your mom but I’m also vice president, how do I react to you when you come to me with a problem—as your mother or as a businessperson? We try to help companies figure out how to make that work.”

    If a family business needs a mediator to help them resolve a serious dispute, Matthews can always find one. But she’s been doing the work long enough that she’s gotten pretty good at being part advisor, part counselor. “When a family comes to me with an issue like trying to figure out whether to sell the business, I often try to talk to people separately,” she says. “In a group they might say, ‘Yes, we want to keep this business,’ but if you talk to them individually they might say, ‘I’m not sure this is right for me.’ Before you get started you have to get everything on the table.”

    Any business advisor working with family businesses must also learn to read between the lines, Matthews says. “We ask lots of questions, and ask them in different ways. What we want to hear is how the person answers the question to see how important it is to them.”

    Sometimes a team approach works really well. Matthews often asks a colleague to attend a difficult meeting with her so he or she can monitor people’s faces as she talks. “They can watch for those who aren’t really buying in to what I’m saying,” she says.

    The inter-generational nature of family firms brings a variety of issues. “In businesses that want to be multi-generational, you get through one generation and immediately their kids are wanting to come into the business,” Matthews says. “So you’re starting again with another group of people. The transition process never really ends.” Having a good succession plan is critical.

    Modern Challenges Facing Traditional Businesses

    Decisions about cash flow and risk-taking rank among the most common sources of conflict for family businesses, Matthews says. “Do we invest in the business or do we start pulling cash out? In general, the younger generation wants to take risks and try new things, but the older generation has already taken risks and wants to retire and is done with that part.”

    Since the end game is different for family businesses, their structure is also different, Matthews says. “When you structure a business to make it attractive to a buyer, it’s much different than how you structure a business so it goes on to your next generation,” she says. Understanding the best way to set up the business, as well as what that means for tax and financial planning, is critical.

    In Matthews’ experience, business structure becomes especially important when a family business transitions from being run by siblings to having cousins on the management team. “There’s a bond when you grow up in the same family,” she says. “When there’s conflict with your siblings, you have a way of dealing with it because you’ve been dealing with it since you were two years old. With your cousins, you haven’t had to deal with conflict.

    If family businesses aren’t structured well, the cousins might fight and the business might be sold because they can’t resolve their differences.”

    The demand for services such as business valuation and succession planning are often higher at family-owned companies, which need good data when working to transition the business from one generation to the next. Many families that own businesses often diversify their holdings by moving into real estate or investing. When they do that, they need good advice about who should own it, how that ownership should be structured, even where to go for the best loan rates and terms.

    These services may fall outside the realm of experience for a smaller CPA firm. And a small- to medium-sized enterprise might get lost in the shuffle at a big firm. That’s one of the many reasons Matthews has worked so hard to establish the Family Business practice at Jones & Roth. Throughout its history the firm has actively sought out businesses that are privately-held and locally-owned.

    Jones & Roth has the depth of knowledge and values to serve the diverse needs of family-owned firms. In addition to offering more traditional services such as tax preparation and planning, financial advising, retirement planning, estate planning, and audit and assurance services, Jones & Roth can also offer help with human resources, IT management and payroll. This one-stop shop approach is great for busy business owners.

    The firm may be large enough to offer a variety of resources, but they haven’t lost their personal touch.

    “Bigger CPA firms tend to have a department that produces financial statements and another department that produces tax returns,” Matthews says. “As a partner, I’m going to be involved in all of those. I might have an assurance team that works on financial statements, but I’m going to be the quarterback. I’m going to make sure everything coordinates together.”

    Sophia Bennett is a freelance business writer based in Eugene, Oregon. Her work has appeared in Oregon Business, 1859 Oregon’s Magazine and many other publications.

  • PPP Loans: Accounting & Financial Reporting Considerations for Business Entities

    PPP Loans: Accounting & Financial Reporting Considerations for Business Entities

    The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) has been a savior to many companies, but it has also certainly come with its complexities. Questions regarding loan eligibility, the application process, and calculation of qualifying expenses quickly arose. And then, there is the issue of how to report the PPP loan and its potential forgiveness in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP). This issue is top of mind for many entities that received PPP loans.

    Please note the accounting for the PPP Loan for tax reporting purposes may vary from that of U.S. GAAP reporting. Please consult your tax advisor regarding tax reporting.

    The following summarizes some of the accounting and financial reporting options for the PPP Loan under U.S. GAAP under the current standards and guidance.

    Entities that Expect to Have Some or All of Their PPP Loan Forgiven

    There is no specific guidance for treatment of a loan to a business entity that may be forgiven if conditions are satisfied. However, U.S. GAAP does note that in the absence of specific guidance, “an entity shall first consider accounting principles for similar transactions or events within a source of authoritative U.S. GAAP for that entity and then consider non-authoritative guidance from other sources” (FASB ASC 105-10-05-2). Therefore, there is suggested guidance to which business entities may refer when accounting for their PPP loans.

    We have included two accounting and reporting options below. Business entities should consult with their CPA on their particular circumstances when deciding which accounting policy to elect.

    Analogizing Contribution Accounting to Business Entities

    Generally not-for-profit (NFP) contribution accounting under FASB ASC 958 includes scope exceptions for business entities; however, the FASB did not prohibit business entities from essentially applying those standards for similar situations (analogizing). A business entity applying the FASB ASC 958-605 government grant or conditional contribution model to a PPP loan would generally recognize contribution revenue as conditions of the forgiveness are “substantially met.”

    In these circumstances, the business entity recipient accounting would be very similar to that of the NFP as noted in our post PPP Loans: Nonprofit Accounting & Reporting Considerations in Accordance with US GAAP. This accounting treatment is appropriate only when the conditions of forgiveness have been substantially met at the assessment date without any ability to forecast. Therefore, conditions, such as the FTE headcount requirement (headcount condition) and limitation on reduction in compensation, need to be substantially met at the assessment date (such as a balance sheet date) and it would not be appropriate to forecast that conditions will be met after the balance sheet date to derecognize the PPP loan liability.

    As a result, an entity may have incurred qualifying expenses during an accounting year but has NOT yet satisfied the headcount condition and/or the limitation on reduction in compensation since the end of the covered period will not take place until after the accounting year. However, it is possible that partial derecognition of the PPP liability could take place based on the extent to which the headcount condition and limitation on reduction in compensation condition had been “substantially met” in stages at the balance sheet date.

    If that is not the case, a business entity should assess whether this accounting treatment or treatment under FASB ASC 470, Debt is most appropriate for users of its financial statements. Take note that the revenue recognized due to the loan forgiveness is not within the scope of FASB ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. As such, revenue recognized should be separately stated and labeled on the financial statements.

    Looking to International Accounting Standards

    International Accounting Standards (IAS), although not considered authoritative in the FASB ASC, may be consulted in cases where the accounting treatment for a particular transaction or similar transaction is not specified in the FASB ASC. IAS 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, provides guidance on government grants for business entities. IAS 20 states that, “a government grant is recognized only when there is reasonable assurance that (a) the entity will comply with any conditions attached to the grant and (b) the grant will be received.”

    IAS 20 also states, “the grant is recognized as income over the period necessary to match them with the related costs, for which they are intended to compensate, on a systematic basis.” By utilizing IAS 20 as a non-authoritative source of guidance, a business entity would recognize as income, the PPP loan forgiveness, as qualifying expenses were incurred so long as other requirements were also met for the period. This accounting treatment is also appropriate only when there is a high likelihood of loan forgiveness.

    If there is not probable loan forgiveness, a business entity should assess whether this accounting treatment or treatment under FASB ASC 470, Debt is most appropriate for users of its financial statements.

    Entities that Expect to Repay Their PPP Loan

    For entities that expect to repay their PPP loan, the loan should be accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC 470, Debt which requires the loan to be reported as a liability (debt) and for related interest to be accrued and also reported as a liability. FASB ASC 405-20 Liabilities: Extinguishments of Liabilities states the debtor shall derecognize the liability if and only if it has been extinguished through payment or at the time the debtor is legally released as the primary obligor under the liability.

    In the case of the PPP loan, the extinguishment would be recognized as the loan and related interest was repaid or at the time forgiveness actually occurs. This treatment may be the most appropriate in cases where there are uncertainties about meeting the conditions of forgiveness.

    Technical Guidance for Potential Safe Harbor

    The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) on its Recently Issued Technical Questions and Answers webpage addressed questions regarding the accounting for PPP loans and noted the treatment under FASB ASC 470 can be used “regardless” of the situation, effectively sanctioning the model as a safe harbor.

    It is important to note that the use of the FASB ASC 470 safe harbor could come with a perceived distortion in financial reporting to some users as a result of a mismatch of timing of expenses incurred and income recognized as the income may be recognized in a later year (when the loan is formally forgiven) than when the qualifying expenses were incurred.

    Concluding Thoughts

    The PPP loan has certainly been helpful to many companies but has created some uncertainty for proper accounting and reporting. In any case, management should assess which accounting treatment is most appropriate for the entity’s unique circumstances and what is most appropriate for reporting to the users of the financial statements.

    Jones & Roth is committed to providing up-to-date information on the PPP and COVID-19. See jrcpa.com for the latest news.

  • PPP Loans: Nonprofit Accounting & Reporting Considerations in Accordance with US GAAP

    PPP Loans: Nonprofit Accounting & Reporting Considerations in Accordance with US GAAP

    The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) has been a savior to many not-for-profit organizations (NFPs), but it has also certainly come with its complexities. Questions regarding loan eligibility, the application process, and calculation of qualifying expenses quickly arose. And then, there is the issue of how to report the PPP loan and its potential forgiveness in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP). This issue is top of mind for many NFPs that received PPP loans. The following summarizes two of the accounting and financial reporting options for the PPP Loan for not-for-profit organizations under the current standards and guidance.

    Organizations that Expect to Have Some or All of Their PPP Loan Forgiven

    NFPs that intend to seek forgiveness may look to Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC) 958-605, Not-for-Profit Entities: Revenue Recognition for guidance. Under FASB ASC 958-605-15-5a contributions are defined as “contributions of cash and other assets, including promises to give, or a reduction, settlement, or cancellation of liabilities.” FASB ASC 958-605-55-21 additionally notes, “other promises are conditioned on promisees’ incurring certain qualifying expenses (or costs). Those promises become unconditional and are recognized to the extent that the expenses are incurred.” The forgiveness of the PPP loans is indeed conditional on the NFP meeting certain requirements including incurring eligible expenses, limitations on reductions to compensation and meeting certain full-time equivalent (FTE) headcount requirements. FASB ASC 958-605 indicates that a transfer of assets that is a conditional contribution is accounted for as a refundable advance (liability) until the conditions have been substantially met.

    The question is then: when are the conditions for the PPP loan forgiveness substantially met? There is certainly an argument to be made that once an organization has overcome the barriers related to FTE headcount and compensation reductions and has incurred qualified expenses, the conditions for PPP loan forgiveness have been substantially met, and therefore, the contribution should be recognized at that time. The actual submission of the loan forgiveness document may be considered an administrative matter which is not included as a true barrier (condition) to recognition of the contribution.

    Under this methodology, one interpretation allows for an NFP to recognize the forgiveness (contribution revenue) in stages for example at the end of a fiscal period for the amount to be forgiven based on substantially meeting the conditions of the forgiveness for that period. The result is that depending on when the conditions are substantially met, an NFP may recognize all or some of the PPP loan as a contribution prior to the time at which the loan is formally forgiven.

    Under this treatment, it is not appropriate to net expenses for the amount of PPP loan expected to be forgiven. The NFP would report (contribution) income and related expenses on a gross basis. If an NFP determined there was all, or a portion of the PPP loan for which the conditions had not been substantially met at the end of their reporting period, that portion should be accounted for as a refundable advance liability until the time at which the conditions were met.

    Organizations that Expect to Repay Their PPP Loan

    For NFPs that expect to repay their PPP loan, the loan should be accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC 470, Debt which requires the loan to be reported as a liability (debt) and for related interest to be accrued and also reported as a liability. FASB ASC 405-20 Liabilities: Extinguishments of Liabilities states the debtor shall derecognize the liability if and only if it has been extinguished through payment or at the time the debtor is legally released as the primary obligor under the liability. In the case of the PPP loan, the extinguishment would be recognized as the loan and related interest was repaid or at the time forgiveness actually occurs. This treatment may be the most appropriate in cases where there are uncertainties about meeting the conditions of forgiveness.

    Technical Guidance for Potential Safe Harbor

    The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) on its Recently Issued Technical Questions and Answers webpage addressed questions regarding the accounting for PPP loans and noted the treatment under FASB ASC 470 can be used “regardless” of the situation, effectively sanctioning the model as a safe harbor.

    It is important to note that the use of the FASB ASC 470 safe harbor could come with a perceived distortion in financial reporting to some users as a result of a mismatch of timing of expenses incurred and income recognized as the income may be recognized in a later year (when the loan is formally forgiven) than when the qualifying expenses were incurred. 

    Concluding Thoughts

    The PPP loan has certainly been helpful to many NFPs but has created some uncertainty for proper accounting and reporting. In any case, management should assess which accounting treatment is most appropriate for the NFP’s unique circumstances and what is most appropriate for reporting to the users of the financial statements. 

    Jones & Roth is committed to providing up-to-date information on the PPP and COVID-19. See jrcpa.com for the latest news.

  • Healthcare Webinar Recording “Telemedicine: The New Normal”

    Healthcare Webinar Recording “Telemedicine: The New Normal”

    “Telemedicine in the New Normal: Best Practices in Coding, Reimbursement & Workflow”
    with Elizabeth Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC

    In this fast-paced, content-rich webinar, we’ll spotlight the pandemic-driven dive into telemedicine and the ever-present challenges of getting paid and efficiently delivering ambulatory care. The rules and regulations about coding for telemedicine and other virtual services changed as rapidly as the spread of the disease.

    Join nationally-recognized practice management expert Elizabeth Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to review the coding for all non-face-to-face services: telemedicine, eVisits, virtual services, remote patient monitoring and more! Correct coding is a wonderful achievement, but it doesn’t necessarily mean money in the bank. This session will also discuss best practices in getting paid. Finally, your practice turned on a dime to deliver quality medical care to your patients; this session will focus on discussing steps to ensure your new workflow is sustainable.

    Webinar Resources:

    Webinar Presentation Slides (PDF)
    Handout for Community Health Centers (PDF)

    Learning Objectives:

    • Understand coding for telemedicine and virtual services.
    • Implement best practices for billing and collecting from payers, as well as patients.
    • Identify opportunities for operating an office under the new normal.

     

    This Presentation is for: 

    • Physicians
    • Practice Managers
    • Clinic Financial Managers
    • HR / Recruiting Managers

     

    Speaker

    Photo of Elizabeth Woodcock

    Elizabeth Woodcock is a speaker, author and consultant who specializes in helping physician practices achieve and sustain patient satisfaction, practice efficiency, and profitability. She is nationally recognized for her outstanding presentations and writings aimed at improving the business of medicine. Her education and expertise, combined with her humor and an engaging delivery, make her popular with physicians and administrators alike.

  • Retirement Plan Audits Performed Remotely

    Retirement Plan Audits Performed Remotely

    The world has become a much more complicated place for businesses of all types with the events of the first half of 2020. Yet there is one constant for many companies—the requirement to have a retirement plan audit by an independent CPA firm.

    Despite changes to the deadlines for many IRS forms, as of now, all sponsors of a 401(k) or other benefit plan with more than 120 participants will be required to submit an independent audit of the plan by July 31, or file an extension and submit an audit by October 15.

    At Jones & Roth, our team of retirement plan audit specialists expect to perform over 100 retirement plan and benefit plan audits in 2020 for clients across the Pacific Northwest. We are preparing to perform every one of the audits remotely. We continue working to improve our processes for each of our plan audit clients to make a remote audit simple and stress-free.

    We use online file share technology, setting up a separate file transfer portal for each client so that information and documents can be shared easily and securely. We also use video-conferencing technology so that we’re able to communicate with you efficiently regarding updates and progress. Our audit team consists of many experienced plan auditors so you can be sure you won’t have to train our staff and that the audit process will be as efficient and quick as possible.

    While we truly enjoy meeting our clients face to face and working in your office, in 2020 performing a retirement plan audit remotely isn’t just a good idea—it may be the only way for many of our clients to have their audits completed. If you have questions or would like to discuss our retirement plan audit approach, please contact us. Stay safe and healthy!

  • WATCH: “Nonprofit Internal Controls in the Remote Working Environment”

    WATCH: “Nonprofit Internal Controls in the Remote Working Environment”

    Fraud can affect any organization, no matter the size, location, or industry. Internal controls are more important than ever in this uncertain environment. In this webinar presentation, Kari Young, CPA and special guest Kristin Short from Oregon Pacific Bank discuss best practices with respect to internal controls. Learn tips and tricks for keeping a strong system of internal controls in a remote working environment.

    WEBINAR RECORDING:
    “Nonprofit Internal Controls in the Remote Working Environment”
    Insights from the CPA and Banking Perspectives 

    Download PDF of the webinar slides

    This webinar is for:
    • Executive Directors
    • Chief Financial Officers
    • Controllers
    • Financial Directors / Managers
    • Board Members

    Presenters:

    Kari Young, CPA
    Partner, Jones & Roth CPAs & Business Advisors
    Kari is a Partner at Jones & Roth and a leader on the Nonprofit team. She holds expert knowledge in the areas of audits, reviews, and federal single audits; consulting services, including internal control review; and informational return preparation services.

    photo of small business banker Kristin Short

    Kristin Short
    VP, Relationship Banking Officer, Oregon Pacific Bank
    Kristin graduated from the University of Oregon and began her community banking career in 2005 after being self-employed for several years. She works with a variety of clients including nonprofits, community-based businesses, and professional service providers.

  • Jones & Roth Construction Team Attends the 2018 Surety Association Annual Holiday Lunch

    Jones & Roth Construction Team Attends the 2018 Surety Association Annual Holiday Lunch

    The Jones & Roth Construction CPA and Advisor team were excited to attend the 2018 Surety Association of Oregon Annual Holiday Lunch. The event was held at the Multnomah Athletic Club and drew a wide community from the surety and bonding industry that supports Oregon construction companies.

    Jones & Roth Construction CPA Sarah Shaw explained, “this wonderful holiday event is an opportunity for us to reconnect with friends and colleagues that we have worked with during the year and meet new people in the Construction services industry. This is a tight-knit community of sureties, bond agents, attorneys and CPAs that encourages and supports everyone’s success. We look forward to this event all year.”

    The event raised nearly $3000 towards a donation to the Portland nonprofit New Avenues for Youth.

    Pictured (L-R) Neil Langlois, CPA; Kori Kapihe, CPA; Kelly Niemela, Surety Bond Manager, Laporte; and Sarah Shaw, CPA

  • WEBINAR: Tax Reform & Planning Opportunities for Physicians, Dentists, and their Practices

    WEBINAR: Tax Reform & Planning Opportunities for Physicians, Dentists, and their Practices

    In this free webcast, you’ll learn about the potential planning opportunities available to you and your medical or dental practice, and how the changes could impact your tax liability for 2018. We’ll review changes to tax rates, exemptions, credits, Section 179, the new 20% deduction for qualified business income (also referred to as the “pass-through deduction”), and new considerations for your business entity.

    Links:  View the Webcast